|
Appendix B:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fig. B.1: Population Stoke |
![]() |
Source: City of Stoke on Trent Council Planning Office
Figures for the September 1996 Annual Employment Survey indicate that 108,000 people were employed within Stoke. These figures can be broken down according to the type of employment. The following Figure compares types of employment in Stoke with a neighbouring LA and with GB as a whole. The industrial nature of Stoke is reflected in the high proportion of its workforce employed in manufacturing.
| Fig. B.2: Employment | ||||
Area |
Agriculture, forestry and fishing (%) |
Manufacturing % |
Construction % |
Services |
| Stoke | 0.11 |
35.98 |
4.27 |
59.64 |
| Staffordshire | 1.32 |
29.67 |
3.60 |
65.41 |
| Great Britain | 1.34 |
18.25 |
3.61 |
76.80 |
Source: Office for National Statistics, Annual Employment Survey 1996
Recent rates of unemployment are shown in the following Figure.
| Fig. B.3: Unemployment rates | |
Area |
Rate of unemployment
|
| Stoke on Trent North | 4.2 |
| Stoke on Trent Central | 5.9 |
| Stoke on Trent South | 4.2 |
| Great Britain | 4.9 |
Source: House of Commons website, research paper June 1998
Figures supplied by DETR in its analysis of local government grant distribution, indicate that Stoke has a low level of social deprivation, but a higher level of economic deprivation in comparison to both England as a whole and non-metropolitan large authorities.
Social deprivation is based on factors such as:
Economic deprivation is based on factors such as:
| Fig. B.4: Deprivation indices | ||
Area |
Social |
Economic |
| Stoke | -2.25 |
1.38 |
| England | -1.90 |
-2.24 |
| Large non-metropolitan | -1.30 |
0.08 |
Source: DETR 1996
Note: Lower negative figure indicates greater level of
deprivation.
In 1997/98 Stoke paid over £56 million in HB and CTB. The amount of rent rebate represented the largest share of benefit paid out, at 50.44% (£28.37 million). The actual benefit payment details are shown in the following Figure.
| Fig. B.5: Benefits paid 1997/98 | |||
Benefit |
Amount (£) |
Number |
% |
| Rent allowance | 18,385,000 |
7,170 |
32.68 |
| Rent rebate | 28,378,000 |
16,204 |
50.44 |
| CTB | 9,494,000 |
29,323 |
16.88 |
| Total | 56,257,000 |
52,697 |
100.00 |
Source: BFI questionnaire
The staff complement for Stoke is 70.8 full-time equivalent staff to administer HB/CTB, overpayments and to carry out visiting and investigation duties. There are, however, currently a number of frozen (unfilled) posts. The cost of administering benefit per claimant is significantly lower than the national average for England, as shown in the following Figure.
| Fig. B.6: Unit cost of benefit administration | ||
Area |
Unit cost |
% of national average |
| Stoke | 57.04 |
72.48 |
| Stafford | 69.35 |
88.12 |
| Stafford Moorlands | 57.36 |
72.88 |
| National average | 78.70 |
100.00 |
Source: Audit Commission performance indicators for England 1996/97
The administration and processing of HB/CTB is centralised in the LAs offices at Lonsdale Chambers, Stoke. The caller reception area is based in the nearby Swann House. Claimants can obtain information relating to benefit entitlement there or at an additional 12 housing area offices throughout the area. Stoke is currently operating a pilot study at the Meir area office, providing a decentralised benefit processing service.
Included in the staff complement for HB/CTB is Stokes Visits and Investigation team, which comprises 6.1 full-time equivalent staff.
Stoke has shown a fall in performance, in terms of both WBS claimed and percentage of threshold achieved, between 1994/95 and 1996/97. An improvement is shown in last years figures submitted to Analytical Services Division (ASD).
| Fig. B.7: WBS claimed against threshold | ||||
Threshold |
WBS |
% of threshold achieved |
Subsidy achieved £ |
|
| 1994/95 | 387,275 |
637,722 |
165 |
59,771 |
| 1995/96 | 368,252 |
379,813 |
103 |
11,519 |
| 1996/97 | 503,365 |
371,322 |
74 |
0 |
| 1997/98 | 578,870 |
450,295 |
78 |
0 |
| GB (1996/97)* | 150,000,000 |
304,000,000 |
204 |
43,000,000 |
Source: DSS
* GB figures for 1997/98 not available
The level of fraud that Stoke claims to have detected for 1996/97, compared to the GB average, is shown in the following Figure.
| Fig. B.8: WBS 1996/97 | ||||
Benefit |
Stoke |
Stoke |
GB average |
GB |
| Rent allowance | 175,825 |
47.35 |
521,452 |
70.96 |
| Rent rebate | 136,740 |
36.83 |
83,501 |
11.36 |
| CTB | 36,648 |
9.87 |
44,972 |
6.12 |
| IS | 20,981 |
5.65 |
83,407 |
11.35 |
| Other benefits | 1,128 |
0.30 |
1,504 |
0.21 |
| Total | 371,322 |
100.00 |
734,836 |
100.00 |
Source: DSS
* GB figures for 1997/98 not available
Results of our analysis of Stokes WBS claims are at Appendix N.
|