Appendix B: Benefit periods
Introduction
Regulations 66(2) of the HB Regulations and regulation 57(2) of the CTB Regulations provide that benefit periods should be determined individually, having regard to any relevant circumstances which may affect entitlement in the future. Berwick BC’s use of standard benefit periods for certain types of claim does not meet its legal obligation to consider the individual circumstances of each case.
It is also good practice in setting benefit periods to reflect the risk that cases present to the benefits system. VF provides guidance in this area by recommending benefit periods based on 5 risk groups. In this appendix we compare the 26 and 52 week benefit periods used by Berwick BC with the recommended periods outlined in VF risk groups A - E. The Figure below helps identify areas where Berwick BC needs to adjust its benefit periods to reflect the level of risk presented and certain areas where its benefit periods are shorter than those proposed in VF.
Findings
|
Fig. B.1: Benefit periods in Berwick BC compared to VF |
|||
Type of cases |
Benefit periods proposed in VF |
Berwick BC action and benefit periods |
|
Group A |
|
26 weeks | Boarders, hostel dwellers and Housing in Multiple Occupancy cases are given a 52 week award. Berwick BC identifies cases of previous fraud using system notepad facilities, no specific action taken on these cases to restrict benefit period. |
Group B |
|
26 weeks | All earnings cases have 26 week awards. Casual or seasonal workers and those with fluctuating earnings are reviewed every 3 months using diary dates on the HB system. Other cases in Group B 52 weeks |
Group C |
|
52 weeks | All Group C cases 52 weeks |
| Group D |
|
52 weeks | Berwick BC makes 26 week awards in self-employed cases. All other Group D cases 52 weeks |
| Group E |
|
52 - 60 weeks | Berwick BC makes 26 week awards in any case with earnings. All other cases 52 weeks |
Source: BFI analysis
VF risk groups A to E are also used to determine the frequency of visits and postal checks. Berwick BC does not have a programme of visits and does not undertake postal reviews.
Conclusions
Over the past 12 months Berwick BC has made some moves towards VF guidelines with changes in verification procedures and by introducing management checks. The benefit periods outlined above show some areas where Berwick BC should make shorter awards to reflect the level of risk presented, particularly in cases involving:
- previous proven fraud
- disreputable landlords
- Statutory Sick Pay or Incapacity Benefit.
In certain areas however, Berwick BC's benefit periods are shorter than VF recommendations, particularly in cases of earned income.

