Appendix D: Progress against recommendations made in 2001
We document in Figure D.1 a summary of the recommendations made at the time of our on-site work in 2001, with the London Borough of Lambeth response to the Secretary of State following the publication of the first report in 2001. We then provide the outcomes of our observations during our on-site work in 2004, identifying whether the London Borough of Lambeth has implemented the original recommendation. We have commented where the recommendations have not been met, or only partially.
|
We recommended in our 2001 report that |
Lambeth's response |
Met Yes/No/Partial/ |
BFI observation following the inspection in 2004 |
|
Strategic management: |
|||
|
Lambeth urgently reviews its current performance monitoring arrangements with Capita to clearly define the standards of performance required by processing staff. To do this it should: · set well-defined performance standards that include standards for processing benefit claims and cover compliance with legislation and processes · monitor achievement against the performance standards |
|
S |
|
|
Devise and implement procedures to check the validity of the statistical data provided by staff. |
Y |
||
|
To improve liaison at local level, Lambeth holds regular meetings with Balham Benefits Agency, to discuss operational issues, the exchange of information and monitoring of the service level agreement. |
From 2001, the Private Sector Manager was responsible for attending regular quarterly meetings with the Benefits Agencies. Service level agreements were developed and signed, although not always renewed at regular annual intervals. |
S |
|
|
To ensure that performance standards are met, Lambeth: · monitors the performance standards of the service level agreement on a regular basis · discusses the standard of performance with Benefits Agency at regular local liaison meetings · takes responsibility for signing the annual certificate of performance. |
The monitoring of the performance standards has been an area of weakness.
Although quarterly meetings with all the Benefit Agency representatives were attended, no special arrangements have been implemented with local offices. |
S |
|
|
To improve communication with Jobcentre Plus, Lambeth ensures that it: · implements an service level agreement based on the national model and agrees with Jobcentre Plus methods of monitoring performance against the standards contained in the agreement · appoints a nominated liaison officer · holds regular local liaison meetings with Jobcentre Plus to discuss performance · arranges for cross training and staff exchanges. |
Private Sector Manager was responsible for this area of work, although meetings with Jobcentre Plus have been sporadic. |
S |
|
|
Lambeth must review its management information needs in respect of liaison work to ensure it has sufficient information to know whether its strategies are working. |
Y |
||
|
Lambeth should review its management information needs in respect of the work carried out by the public liaison teams. The collection and analysis of appropriate data will help the local authority establish the effectiveness of its liaison arrangements and provide wider data on the quality and speed with which claims are being processed. |
As stated previously, the provision of management information was completely reviewed in 2001. However, although the work of the Public Liaison team was covered in the weekly statistics, it was felt that the creation of the separate team would promote the concept of ownership and the achievement of agreed performance standards. |
P |
|
|
Lambeth ensure that it, in conjunction with Capita: · reviews the Academy system capabilities and the configurations set to improve system security and provide all available on-line guidance to staff · urgently agrees the management information required, using the guidance above and by sharing best practices from other Academy users. The frequency of all information should be agreed and adhered to. |
A consultant was employed to review the system generated information
produced from Academy to generate comprehensive management information. |
P |
Interviews with relevant parties and review of audit report confirms the systems are secure.
Although the issue of establishing effective segregation of duties has been greatly improved through the introduction of a group-based security structure, there are currently no controls in place to monitor the ongoing appropriateness of this structure or whether the groups to which users are assigned are commensurate with their job. |
|
To ensure a more rigorous contract-monitoring regime, Lambeth: · introduces a systematic performance measurement of the contract with Capita based on the HB specification within the contract · makes one officer solely responsible for the monitoring of the contract · reviews the contract monitoring staffing resources. |
|
S |
|
|
To promote the benefits of staff appraisal and reinforce its commitment to it, Lambeth ensures that Capita management: · reviews the existing programme · considers the impact of the appraisal procedures when developing action plans to reduce work · ensures team leaders are given sufficient time to prepare for and undertake appraisal interviews. |
S |
||
|
Capita introduces a formal system of evaluation to determine the effectiveness of the current training activities. |
S |
||
|
To improve line management accountability for training and development proposals for Capita staff, Lambeth should ensure that: · the central training budget is devolved to the site contract manager · the site contract manager is given a specific allocation for the financial year · managers and team leaders are provided with sufficient financial information and support from the training section to develop a training plan that does not exceed the budget allocation · training profiles are monitored by the training manager and the site contracts manager · training profiles are evaluated at the end of each financial year. |
|
S |
|
|
Lambeth reconsiders the level of internal audit activity in HB and CTB and increases activity to take account of the levels of spend and risk it presents. |
Internal audit activity at Lambeth is determined by a risk assessment model, which included the size of HB/CTB measured in both volume/value terms and other relevant reviews (e.g. PIAT). Also, the HB/CTB audit is done annually under the Audit Commission’s ‘managed audit’ whereby we have to use their methodology, so that they can rely on the audit work.
|
N |
We can find no evidence that the allocated audit days match the associated benefits spend. |
|
To ensure that recommendations made by internal audit and District Audit are within agreed timescales: · nominated officers charged with taking forward recommendations report quarterly on progress and are made accountable for their actions · the Chief Executive and Members review progress reports. |
Y |
||
|
Internal audit and District Audit use the findings from this report to target their resources. |
Internal audit and District Auditdo co-ordinate their annual audit planning to avoid duplication and target emerging business risks. |
N |
There is no evidence that resources are targeted in line with the findings of earlier audits. |
|
Lambeth undertakes further work to improve performance in relation to: · the outstanding recommendations identified in Appendix F · the level of compliance with section 1(1A) and (1B) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 procedures · the potential number of HB and CTB payments made to customers without reference to the Determination Officer · the consistency and reliability of data supplied by Capita to Lambeth. |
|
S |
|
|
To help Capita and Lambeth make informed decisions about the quality and level of the service they offer to customers, Lambeth ensures that Capita: · reviews the use of the Academy system · identifies the areas where performance and management reporting can be improved. |
S |
||
|
To improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the Benefits section, Lambeth: · defines specific work allocations for staff · periodically rotates staff responsibilities within the team. |
The initial reorganisation in 2001 and the reorganisation of procedures arising brought greater productivity and accountability. As the focus of the service has evolved, officers have been given the opportunity to expand their skills databases by working within other areas. |
P |
|
|
Customer services |
|||
|
To improve the quality of service provided to those who visit Olive Morris House, Lambeth ensures that Capita: · ensures there is an adequate number of reception staff to assist the public |
|
|
|
|
· measures the time taken for all public callers to be dealt with at Olive Morris House and uses the information to improve service delivery |
These became part of the weekly statistics |
P |
Only measures the waiting time for callers without an appointment. |
|
· identifies, records and analyses the reasons callers that visit Olive Morris House. |
Although reasons for visits are recorded on the customer record sheet an analysis is still not being done |
Y |
|
|
To improve the quality of service provided to those who contact the call centre, Lambeth ensures that Capita: · ensures that all correspondence received is recorded on the information technology system |
Y |
||
|
· introduces procedures so that the call centre team is aware of the state of work in Lambeth and develops scripts for the call centre team to use when dealing with callers |
Y |
||
|
· benefit processors return calls to callers who have requested an update on the progress of the claim. |
Y |
||
|
Lambeth stops using the shortened renewal claim form immediately as it increases the risk of fraud and error entering the system. |
S |
||
|
Lambeth introduces a single claim form for all types of HB and CTB claims, including renewal claims, thereby ensuring that all relevant information is captured accurately efficiently and as well as fully meeting the requirements of the Verification Framework. |
Y |
||
|
Lambeth ensures that Capita puts in place procedures to control requests for further information and takes the necessary action to record the receipt of all information on the Academy system. |
S |
||
|
To be fully compliant with legal requirements, Lambeth: · changes its determination notice templates and ensures that assessors, when tailoring the templates: - include all necessary information - give full and appropriate reasons for any changes in entitlement covered by the determination notice. · determination notices are: - only issued after a case has been determined - included in the checks carried out by management and determination officers. |
Reason codes have been changed and the letters substantially amended. |
N
N P
Y
|
Lambeth does not inform customers that they are entitled to a written explanation of the decision made.
Although Lambeth informs customers of the need to report changes of circumstances it does not inform customers of the consequences of not reporting changes of circumstances. |
|
To ensure that customers are more aware of the need to report changes, in the longer term, Lambeth adds reminders to remittance notices and uses posters in the public areas of council offices. |
Y |
||
|
To improve the level of information available to customers, stocks of leaflets are made available at in the reception area at Olive Morris House. This will reduce the number of enquiries at reception and improve customer service. |
Y |
||
|
To ensure that staff are trained in the correct procedures to follow on reviews and appeals, Lambeth provides written guidance. This will assist staff and management as it will: · result in a better understanding of roles and responsibilities · lead to a consistent approach by all staff · provide staff with a reference point when handling enquiries from customers · enable management to measure performance against current procedures and baseline procedures and performance. |
Y |
||
|
To improve management information, Lambeth records all relevant information in the review process. |
Done |
P |
Management information is collected for complaints and appeals. However, it is not used effectively to manage the workflow. |
|
Lambeth urgently investigates the reasons for delay in review board procedures and takes steps to ensure that timescales detailed in legislation are adhered to. |
S |
||
|
To inform training needs, Lambeth analyses the outcome of first stage reviews and review boards. This could: · significantly reduce the number of reviews received · improve performance targets on HB and CTB applications · reduce the level of resources employed on the review process · improve relations with customers, Members and outside organisations. |
The allocated Training and Policy officer regularly attends the Appeals team meetings to identify trends and training needs. These are then fed back into the training plan. |
P |
The Appeals Manager liases with the Training and Quality team regarding the outcomes and reasons for appeals. However, around 50% of reconsiderations made by the Appeals team are made in favour of the customers. This implies an un-addressed training need for assessment officers. |
|
The Capita complaints and backlog complaint teams amalgamate to handle all complaints. |
S |
||
|
To measure performance effectively on MPs’ enquiries, Lambeth should: · provide staff with written procedures · agree and publish targets for each part of the procedure · control procedures through programming the Respond information technology system. |
|
Y
Y
Y |
|
|
· Local Government Organisation statistics are kept and analysed to monitor contract performance and better improve the benefit payment process · Lambeth ensures that its complaints handling guide is issued to Capita and that it is used to measure Capita’s performance · comprehensive guidance is issued to all complaints staff, and is continually updated · one central client team receives all complaints and allocates them to Capita · a training needs analysis is undertaken and any training identified is taken forward urgently · complaints statistics are kept and analysed to monitor contract performance. |
|
S
S
S
Y
Y
|
|
|
To identify the training needs of staff more effectively: · a forum consisting of team leaders, staff employed on complaints, appeals and determination officers and training officers meet regularly to discuss and plan ways of improving performance through training |
|
||
|
· a formal agenda should be drawn up with contributions invited from benefit processing staff |
Y |
||
|
· formal minutes from the forum should be published and discussed at section team meetings |
|
Y |
|
|
· the effectiveness of the forum is evaluated after 6 months and the results reported to the Lambeth and Capita senior management teams. |
Y |
||
|
Processing claims |
|||
|
Lambeth ensures that Capita: · draws up a clear action plan, with achievable targets for clearance of the backlog · nominates an officer responsible for managing the backlog and new work · reviews the resources required for the Primary Assessment team and Assessment teams · provides accurate management information on the amount of work outstanding · implements a performance management system including a comprehensive checking regime. In addition, to satisfy itself that the backlog of work is being cleared, Lambeth must: · validate the information provided by Capita · closely monitor Capita’s progress towards the clearance of the backlog. |
|
S |
|
|
To help Lambeth better secure the benefits service a more efficient and controlled filing and case control system must be provided. We recommend that Lambeth ensures that Capita fully implements the proposals for the revised filing system. |
|
S |
|
|
Lambeth stops using the shortened renewal claim form immediately as it increases the risk of fraud and error entering the system. |
S |
||
|
Lambeth introduces a single claim form for all types of HB and CTB claims, including renewal claims, thereby ensuring that all relevant information is captured accurately efficiently and as well as fully meeting the requirements of the Verification Framework. |
Y |
||
|
Lambeth ensures that Capita puts in place procedures to control requests for further information and takes the necessary action to record the receipt of all information on the Academy system. |
|
S |
|
|
Corporate Anti-Fraud team refers to the Benefits section details of all cases where residency has been verified. |
Superseded following disbanding of Corporate Anti-Fraud team and creation of Lambeth Benefit Investigation team |
N |
We were told that the outcome of these visits is not always communicated to the Benefits service. |
|
Lambeth reports the outcome of all visits to the Assessment teams Corporate Anti-Fraud team liaises with Benefits Agency to develop a joint visiting programme and ensure information on visits is exchanged Lambeth subjects rent rebate cases to the same scrutiny as rent allowance cases The Housing Department are prevented from influencing the work of the HB section. |
Superseded following disbanding of Corporate Anti-Fraud team and creation of Lambeth Benefit Investigation team |
Y |
|
|
We recommend that Lambeth ensures that Capita improves its verification procedures, and reduces the opportunity for fraud and error to occur, by: · revising its verification procedures to reflect more closely the principles of the Verification Framework · accepting only original documents to substantiate all elements of the claim · ensuring all relevant information is gathered before a claim is assessed and paid · paying greater attention to the quality of information gathered · applying a consistent approach to verifying all elements of a claim · making greater use of the Remote Access Terminal to check IS/JSA(IB) entitlement · introducing formal procedures to check residency at the outset of a claim, particularly in rent allowance claims and those involving temporary accommodation outside the borough · making sure staff pay greater attention to crosschecking all information provided by the customer in support of their claim. |
New Verification procedures were drawn up and trained to all staff,
including a large number of housing officers. We intend to be Verification
Framework visits and reviews modules compliant by
We now fully utilise the Remote Access Terminal in checking entitlement. |
S |
|
|
Lambeth ensures that Capita increases the coverage of checks and ensures the checking level does not fall below 10%. Also, it must introduce procedures to ensure checks are recorded and reported and used to determine instances of poor performance and training needs. |
S |
||
|
To comply with the legislation and reduce the opportunity for fraud and error to occur, Lambeth must immediately draw up and implement procedures with Capita to ensure that: · all assessed cases are received by the Determination team, including those that have been returned for correction and abandoned cases · system action to pay benefit and issue notifications is suspended until a determination has been made · the number of assessments made are reconciled with determinations made · determination officers cover the full range of issues when checking assessments · senior determination officers carry out a 10% check of determination made to monitor the quality and improve consistency of determinations made · information collected on rejected assessments is put to full use to help improve the quality of assessment work and to clarify the roles and responsibilities of assessment and determination staff · staffing levels are appropriate to provide for the above. |
S |
|
Lambeth ensures that Capita urgently reviews its processes to improve processing times as this delay in assessing claims causes hardship to customers. To do this it should: · ensure that all claims are looked at promptly on receipt, so that further evidence can be requested immediately · make effective use of management information systems to monitor whether claims are assessed within timescales · ensure staff are aware of priorities and necessary deadlines · use management checks to ensure processes are being kept to · consider whether current resources are adequate. |
S |
||
|
Lambeth should ensure that Capita puts in place procedures, supported by documentary guidance, to refer all cases for payment on account determinations if a full determination has not been made by day 15. Lambeth should also ensure that Capita implements the necessary monitoring arrangements to make sure payments on account do not continue beyond a maximum period of 13 weeks. |
S |
||
|
To improve the quality, consistency and security of the DCI1 process, Lambeth ensures that: · 100% management checks are completed on all DCI1 forms · all rejected applications are reported to Capita · discusses the standard of
DCI1 completion at regular local liaison meetings with Benefits Agency. |
S |
||
|
Lambeth changes its arrangements for creating and sending Rent Officer referrals so as to ensure each referral is made by them and not by the contractor. |
S |
||
|
To ensure compliance with its statutory responsibilities, Lambeth monitors its performance in dealing with the Rent Officer. |
Y |
||
|
To strengthen its working relationship with the Rent Officer, Lambeth: · develops and signs a service level agreement with the Rent Service, based on the nationally agreed document · introduces a mechanism for measuring performance against the targets contained in the service level agreement · implements procedures that ensure Rent Officer referrals are issued on time on all appropriate cases and that replies from the Rent Officer are monitored and actioned as soon as possible after receipt · introduces procedures for dealing with Pre-Tenancy Determinations · introduces formal arrangements to meet regularly with the Rent Officer so that effective communication takes place. |
Procedures in place
|
Y
P
P Y |
|
|
To improve the efficiency of the administration of work involving the Rent Officer, Lambeth: · ensures data is input to the Academy system · reviews its arrangements for the dispatch of referrals to the Rent Officer · publicises Pre-Tenancy Determinations · carries out compliance checks to confirm the correct working practices are being followed. |
Y N
Y |
||
|
Lambeth ensures that Capita improves controls and management information in respect of renewal claims to ensure that: · follow up action is taken on non-returned renewals · renewal claims are prioritised and actioned to minimise the number of cases in which there is a break in payments · the quality of data collection (including the resolution of inconsistencies), recording and input is improved · full use is made of data on renewals to help risk manage claims, review renewal claim forms and inform training needs · the Academy system is programmed
to ensure payments do not exceed |
S |
||
|
To ensure that staff comply with legal requirements when setting benefit periods and understand and follow its own policies, Lambeth needs to: · improve guidance on benefit
periods, making clear, amongst other things, its policy on the award
of · set criteria for reducing benefit periods for claims where circumstances are likely to change · ensure it complies with relevant regulations when setting benefit periods. |
Now superseded by abolition of benefit periods. |
S |
|
|
To ensure that changes of circumstances notifications are processed with the necessary speed and accuracy, Lambeth: · uses the diary facility on Academy to control cases · introduces procedures for recording the date of receipt and clearance of notifications · introduces procedures and checks to ensure that the date of change has been established and the correct date for reassessment used · reviews and revises the policy and procedures for assessing cases without a file. |
The review in 2001 addressed these issues. Procedures are in place. Quality Team checks undertaken. Implementation of Cave Tab filing system then Document Image Processing enabled assessments without a file to be phased out. |
Y
Y
S |
|
|
To ensure that customers are more aware of the need to report changes, in the longer term, Lambeth adds reminders to remittance notices and uses posters in the public areas of council offices. |
Y |
||
|
Working with landlords |
|||
|
Lambeth sets up landlord forums and develops landlord information packs,
but initially it must ensure its keeps its list of registered landlords
|
Y |
||
|
To improve liaison with Housing Associations and private landlords, Lambeth works with the Housing Associations and major private landlords to agree the necessary mechanisms and formal working arrangements which: · formalise working relationships · include agreed performance
targets, outlining both quantifiable and · include a mechanism for measuring performance against targets. |
Y |
|
|
|
Lambeth must review its management information needs in respect of liaison work to ensure it has sufficient information to know whether its strategies are working. |
Y |
||
|
Lambeth develops internal management arrangements between the Housing Department and the Benefits section that cover the full range of liaison issues, including: · procedures for reducing the number of council tenants on which court action is taken when rent arrears are due to delays in processing Housing Benefit claims · the role of Housing and Benefits staff in respect of these procedures · a senior officer takes responsibility to ensure changes occur · clear performance targets are set and actively monitored. |
|
|
|
|
Lambeth introduces arrangements that ensure procedures are in place: · to inform the Benefits section immediately when a local authority property is suspected of being abandoned · for notifying on abandoned properties · to ensure appropriate action is taken. |
Weekly update from Housing information technology system |
N |
There are no clear arrangements in place to notify the Benefits section when a property is abandoned. |
|
Lambeth maximises recovery from landlords by: · reviewing existing debts owed by landlords · assessing their suitability for recovery under section 75(5)(b) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992. |
|
|
Blameless Tenant recovery is still not undertaken. |
|
Internal security |
|||
|
Lambeth reviews and introduces revised post opening procedures immediately. In particular, Lambeth should ensure that Capita addresses the identified weaknesses as detailed above. |
Despite assurances from Capita we found significant weaknesses in the post procedure when this function was taken back in house in May 2004. These have now been addressed |
N |
A number of weaknesses identified in the first inspection had not been implemented. The post was not opened in a totally secured area which was free from clutter. |
|
Lambeth improves the security of the payment process by: · reviewing the security of the Cashiers section and taking urgent remedial action where required · providing staff with lockers for personal belongings. |
|
Y
|
|
|
Lambeth improves the security of the payment process by: · changing the cheque and giro format to laser printed cut sheets · printing a time limit for encashment on its cheques · ensuring that staff are instructed that errors on the cheque and giro stock control sheets should clearly deleted, and the correct entry made on the next available line · regularly updating the signature list of authorised courier staff |
Superseded as cheques production methods and procedures now changed |
S |
|
|
· using a security courier to return printed cheques and giros to Olive Morris House · arranging for duplicate keys to the lockable steel boxes to be held securely at Olive Morris House · ensuring that the printed cheques and giros are delivered to the Cashiers section · arranging for the empty steel boxes to be returned to West Malling unlocked · supervising staff engaged in enveloping and sealing duties at all times. |
|
|
|
|
Lambeth improves the security of the payment process by controlling the issue and return of cheques and giros for enveloping and sealing. |
|
S |
|
|
Lambeth improves the security of the payment process by: · allowing only a restricted number of authorised supervisory staff to create and amend direct credit details · requiring changes to existing direct credit addresses to be authorised and recorded by supervisory staff |
|
P |
All Benefits staff have the facility to amend creditor details, although this triggers a report to the Payment team. Benefits staff cannot create the initial creditor record. |
|
Lambeth improves the security of the payment process by deploying sufficient resources to clear the backlog of returned cheques. |
Y |
||
|
Lambeth improves the security of the payment process by: · referring suspicious cases
where payments have been returned, to Corporate · instructing all staff that returned cheques should be cancelled upon receipt · reconciling payments with bank statements at least every month · ensuring that the list of unpresented cheques is referred to the Payments section every month for clearance · requiring the payments section
to refer Payments that remain unpresented within a specified period
of time to Corporate |
|
Y N
|
XXXX XXXX XXXX XX XXXX XXXX XXXX X XXXX XXXX XXXX XXX XXXX XXXX XXXX X XXXX X
There was no evidence that this is performed monthly. Payment reconciliation remains an issue for Lambeth. XXXX XXXX XXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXX Uncashed cheques are not always referred to Lambeth Benefit Investigation team. |
|
Lambeth should: · introduce keypad entry systems for all access doors and lifts from common areas · change the building access codes at least quarterly, or more frequently if the turnover of staff demands it · stop leaving confidential benefit files in an insecure area. |
|
N
N |
Although the facility is now available, we observed that locks were taped up. This negates the effectiveness of changing access codes. The fraud area is insecure. |
|
To help provide assurance as to the integrity of the information technology system and the data held in the system, Lambeth ensures Capita: · immediately examines any system transactions after the dates employees have left to identify if there are any inappropriate transactions · implements monthly checks of the list of authorised users to ensure that all staff leaving employment have had access rights deleted. |
|
|
|
|
To improve the security and integrity of the benefit system, Lambeth monitors the recruitment activity of the contractor to ensure that: · references for temporary staff are followed up by site managers · an induction programme for new staff is undertaken · communications between Capita management and the training section are improved. |
S
Y |
|
|
|
Lambeth urgently: · provides all staff with written procedures to ensure they do not deal with sensitive cases such as those of friends or relatives · ensures that the details form part of the induction process for Lambeth and Capita staff · undertakes periodic management checks to ensure compliance |
|
Y
|
|
|
Counter-fraud |
|||
|
To improve the reporting of fraud, Lambeth ensures that Capita: · introduces formal arrangements
for the call centre team to record allegations of suspected fraud
and make necessary referrals to Corporate · ensures procedures are in place to provide feedback to the call centre team on the outcome of fraud referrals. |
I am in contact with the call centre by e-mail and by phone. I have provided guidance to them on how to make referrals to fraud for investigation and also referrals for welfare visits to the visiting officers. I have provided guidance notes so that they are clear with Lambeth Benefit Investigation team procedures so that they can effectively field enquiries, in particular where claims are suspended or it is noted on Academy notes that an investigation is underway. In my experience I am not aware that call centres provide any significant referrals by way of quantity or quality. Lambeth is participating in a London wide benchmarking exercise. If there is evidence that call centres elsewhere are a source of effective referrals then I shall review my stance. |
P |
Although procedures and a referral process are in place, little fraud awareness training is undertaken. Feedback is also sporadic. |
|
Lambeth introduces arrangements that ensure procedures are in place: · to inform the Benefits section immediately when a local authority property is suspected of being abandoned · for notifying on abandoned properties · to ensure appropriate action is taken. |
A tenancy fraud team (Lambeth Housing Investigation team) has been set up. They work closely with Lambeth Benefit Investigation team and have carried out joint prosecutions. The two visiting officers report back any discrepancies found. INCASE manages investigations and recommendations to HB dept are always followed up. |
Y
Y Y
|
|
|
Lambeth: · fraud and administration staff work together and share information to identify risks and develop the procedures needed to minimise them · carries out broader and more detailed risk analysis work, using local knowledge and by analysing, amongst other things, changes of circumstances notifications and non-returned renewal claims · introduces arrangements for categorising claims according to risk. |
The revised Verification Framework and Security Against Fraud and Error have superseded this.
Verification Framework will be adopted in 2004/05
|
S |
|
|
Lambeth reviews the requirements of the fraud case management system. |
S |
||
|
Lambeth reinstates frequent and regular fraud awareness sessions for all of Capita’s benefits staff. |
N |
Not yet |
|
|
Lambeth improves the effectiveness of fraud publicity and the hotline by: · ensuring that hotline posters display the correct telephone number · use of a freefone number · displaying the hotline posters at Olive Morris House · revising the format of the anonymous telephone call stencil to collect all relevant information · providing a stock of report forms and fraud awareness training to the staff at the Coventry call centre · monitoring the outcome of hotline referrals. |
See current report
|
N
|
No posters in evidence.
No monitoring is performed. |
|
Lambeth obtains better quality referrals from the Benefits section by: · increasing the number of fraud awareness seminars for assessment and counter staff · simplifying the procedures for benefits staff to make a referral requiring less information · considering permanently locating
Corporate |
|
N
Y
|
Not yet.
|
|
· all referrals are systematically sifted and prioritised by using risk analysis techniques · formal feedback of outcomes is given to individual referrers in the Benefits section · all referrals are logged on to the FACTS database · fraud files are created for all accepted referrals · all referrals are risk assessed to aid prioritisation · rejected referrals are analysed to inform future fraud awareness training for benefits staff. |
Referrals logged on INCASE - FACTS no longer used INCASE is a modern fraud management system with a robust audit trail. It does away with the requirement to maintain paper files in all cases. Paper files are used mainly to store evidence gathered in the course of investigations and of course for prosecution and sanction cases |
N
N
Y P
|
The facility is available but is not used.
Fraud files are created for all referrals that are accepted for investigation. Evidence of analysis is not available. |
|
Lambeth: · make better use of the ‘Do Not Redirect’ mail scheme, by extending its coverage to include all outgoing benefits correspondence · refer all cases where mail has been returned to Corporate Anti-Fraud team for investigation · monitor the number and value of all mail returned. |
|
N
|
This is not an HB issue. HB staff have been instructed not to refer ‘Do Not Redirect’ referrals.
It is recorded but is not monitored. |
|
To improve the speed of investigations, Lambeth ensures that: · all cases suitable for investigation are referred to investigators as quickly as possible · fraud managers review progress on open fraud cases at more frequent, regular intervals. |
|
|
Although we were informed that reviews take place, they are not documented. |
|
To improve the quality of management information, fraud managers should check investigation officers’ notebooks at regular intervals. This information can be used to inform on the effectiveness of its fraud investigation teams. |
Notebooks are not used by Lambeth Benefit Investigation team. INCASE is used to record activity |
N |
No notebooks are in use. |
|
To ensure the validity of non residency or ‘gone away’ Weekly Benefit Saving claims and to ensure that fraudulent overpayments are fully identified, Lambeth: · ensures that all investigators are familiar with the no residency or ‘gone away’ guidance contained in Circular HB/CTB F17/98 and the Income-Related Benefits (Subsidy to Authorities) Orders 1998 · makes full enquiries to confirm that customers have ceased to occupy properties as their home · seeks to identify the date of change of circumstances wherever possible. |
No longer relevant
|
N/A
|
Not relevant.
|
|
To improve the quality of fraud investigation techniques: · Lambeth provides refresher training on good practices to the fraud investigators · fraud managers set quality standards and conduct regular checks to ensure standards are met. |
|
N
N |
Training investigators are very experienced. No documented management checks are in place. |
|
Lambeth ensures that Weekly Benefit Saving claims are valid by: · implementing a thorough management check of all Weekly Benefit Saving claims · providing staff with appropriate training on the criteria required to claim a Weekly Benefit Saving. |
|
|
|
|
To improve the effectiveness of Lambeth’s fraud visiting programme: · it is extended to include visits to rent rebate cases · it includes a full verification check on all aspects of the claim by the Visiting Officer · the outcomes of all visits
are reported back to Benefits by Corporate · resources are targeted towards high-risk cases · Visiting officers receive training on evidence gathering · Performance targets for Visiting officers are linked to completed visits · Visiting officers liaise with Benefits Agency. |
Visiting Team disbanded with Corporate |
N |
These recommendations are not met. While we accept the team was disbanded, the recommendations are still relevant to fraud visiting officers. |
|
To improve the effectiveness of management checks on fraud work, Corporate
· implements a thorough and regular checking and monitoring regime by Group Fraud Managers on all fraud investigation cases · ensures consistency in the frequency and extent of those cases selected for check by developing guidance for the Group Fraud Managers · introduces a programme of regular accompanied visits, including unannounced visits · ensures that all cases under investigation are reviewed by Group Fraud Managers at regular intervals to ensure that the necessary progress is being made · requires that closure of all cases is authorised by Group Fraud Managers. |
|
N
N
N
N
N |
No documented checks.
No documented checks.
Not yet.
Not yet.
Closures are not authorised. |
|
· seeks to identify at an earlier stage those cases that may be suitable for a prosecution or other sanction · develops procedures to administer cautions where appropriate. |
Y
Y |
||
|
Lambeth develops a new counter-fraud strategy making reference to BFI’s Good Practice Guide, taking into account the changes within Corporate Anti-Fraud team, the changes in reporting lines and the new decision-making structure the strategy: · makes particular reference to HB/CTB fraud · makes reference to the full range of sanctions open to Lambeth · includes a definition of fraud and corruption. |
|
Y
|
|
|
· fraud awareness training for each organisation’s staff is carried out regularly · further exchanges of personnel take place · Lambeth and Benefit Fraud Investigation Service develop procedures to monitor the service level agreement · Lambeth and Benefit Fraud Investigation Service develop a strategy for closer working · Benefit Fraud Investigation Service formally overloads appropriate cases. |
Training and Policy will set up through invitation to Lambeth Benefit
Investigation team at least |
N
N
|
Planned but not yet.
|
|
Lambeth, as a senior partner in counter-fraud initiatives with external bodies, invites Benefits Agency/Benefit Fraud Investigation Service and Benefits Agency Security Investigation Service to take part, to widen the representation and effectiveness of these bodies. |
See response to current draft report. But also note that Benefits Agency Security Investigation Service no longer exists and that Howell opinion has limited the amount of joint working that is feasible. |
N |
No close working with Counter-Fraud Investigation Service. |
|
Lambeth reviews its current various counter-fraud statements and business plans and formulates one coherent policy. |
Y |
||
|
Overpayments |
|||
|
Lambeth should withhold benefit while awaiting further information; either to confirm residency or that the tenant is no longer resident. This will ensure that HB is paid in accordance with legal requirements and minimise overpayments for which no subsidy is payable. |
Visits undertaken for large value first payments |
N |
Lambeth does not withhold benefit while checks are carried out to confirm residency. |
|
All recovery action should sit with one team to prevent duplication of effort. |
Y |
||
|
Lambeth reviews its current policy and procedures documentation to ensure that the various sources of documentation are brought together. There should be one up-to-date reference source covering: · all of the legal requirements placed on Local Authorities when assessing and determining overpayments · any internal polices, such as at what level to set recovery, when to recover (which can have both legal and policy dimensions) and the checks to go through when assessing claims to HB and CTB to ensure that outstanding overpayments can be recovered from current benefit entitlement. |
Y
Y
|
||
|
· Lambeth introduces the procedures and guidance for documenting its decisions and ensures that these are properly communicated to all staff making decisions on HB and CTB overpayments · to ensure consistency the updated policy and processes should contain guidance on when to attempt to recover a recoverable overpayment. |
Y
|
The policy and procedures manual being written will detail guidance on when to recover a recoverable overpayment. |
|
|
Lambeth thoroughly reviews the circumstances of each overpayment and ensures that the correct classification and periods of the overpayment are applied. |
N |
Overpayments are not thoroughly reviewed to ensure correct classification and periods of overpayment. |
|
|
· ensures that its staff understand: · HB regulations 91(3) and · that not all recoverable overpayments have to be recovered · provides guidance on how to document and record decisions taken on the recoverability of overpayments. |
|
Y Y |
|
|
Lambeth provides guidance for staff to help them decide the best person to recover overpaid HB from. |
Y |
||
|
As a matter of urgency Lambeth develops a training plan to: · assess gaps in staff’s knowledge of the HB and CTB Regulations relating to overpayments · make sure that staff are aware of the need to check the various computer systems for previous debts and take the necessary action · ensure that staff clearly understand Lambeth’s internal policies on overpayments and the action to take. |
Y
Y
Y
|
|
|
|
Lambeth carries out an assessment of the suitability for recovery of all outstanding debts, where no recovery is currently taking place. Where recovery is likely to be possible Lambeth should reissue a notice of determination compliant with Schedule 6 and begin recovery action. This should form part of a rolling programme that will eventually assess the suitability of all debt for recovery and also guarantee that the legal basis for the recovery of these debts is sound. |
Y |
. |
|
|
· ensures that staff are made aware of the changes to rates of recovery explained in DSS HB/CTB Circular A42/2000 · develops a policy for setting rates of recovery · develops management checks to test compliance with the policy. |
Y
|
The information technology system does not automatically update all recovery rates each time they are changed. Assessors have to do it manually when they encounter an out of date rate. There is no management check undertaken to check that rates have been updated. |
|
|
Lambeth formalises liaison arrangements by ensuring that: · the Recovery team explores the possibility of formal links with other sections of the LA pursuing debt so that all debts can be pursued as one · suitable arrangements are put in place to ensure that relevant data protection legislation is not breached · there are formalised procedures for the exchange of information. |
The council has a corporate debt forum and monthly details of our debt are feed into this.
Work still ongoing |
N
N
N |
There are no formal links with other sections of the local authority to facilitate unilateral debt recovery. |
|
· investigates ways of ensuring that ‘bulk’ recoveries are accounted for separately to ensure that managers have a true picture of the recovery status of debts · ensures that debts are regularly monitored and action is taken on cases in a timely manner · implements a refund procedure. |
|
Y
Y
Y |
|
|
Lambeth maximises recovery from landlords by: · reviewing existing debts owed by landlords · assessing their suitability
for recovery under section 75(5)(b) of the Social Security Administration
Act 1992. |
|
|
|
|
· urgently analyses its current debt and assesses its suitability for recovery through other means such as: · recovery from other social security benefits · recovery from landlords under section 75(5) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 · registration of debts at county court · ensures that debtor accounts are effectively monitored and chased where the customer has failed to repay overpayments. |
Process was unsuccessful due to Department for Work and Pensions. Now being restarted |
Y
Y
Y |
Lambeth does not recover from landlords under section 75(5) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992. |
|
Lambeth explores the possibility of using debt collection agencies where all other means to trace and recover debt have failed. |
Still under review due to the quality of information held on old debt. We have approached agencies and discussed but until the data base is cleared we can not support some of the debt with documentary evidence |
N |
No debt collection agencies have been used, although the council has said it will be looking at this recovery method. |
|
Lambeth sets up procedures to make use of the powers provided under HB regulation 105 and CTB regulation 91. |
This process was some what hindered by Department for Work and Pensions responses. With only a 1.5% success rate of trace and a 0% success of getting money as we were so far down a list of debtors. Now restarted with new initiative from Department for Work and Pensions |
N |
This recommendation has not been implemented. The council makes limited use of these powers. |
|
Lambeth puts in place procedures to allow it to make use of section (75)(7) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992. |
Y |
||
|
As a matter of urgency Lambeth develops its procedures for taking debtors to court making full use of all available legislative powers. |
Y |
||
|
· the write-off policy is approved by Members and changed from being a working draft to an agreed policy document · the signatures of authorised signatories are reviewed to take account of changes in staff. This should be carried out on a monthly basis · procedures are streamlined so that smaller write-offs can be authorised by officers other than the Executive Director of Finance and Corporate Services · written off debts should form part of the management checking regime. |
|
Y
N
|
Authorised signatories are not reviewed regularly to take account of changes in staff and written-off debts are not part of the management checking regime.
|
|
Lambeth enhances its current management information to report on all aspects of the overpayment process as detailed in this report. |
P |
Management information covers all aspects of overpayments, although it is confusing and in many cases, irrelevant. |
|
|
Lambeth reviews its current target-setting regime to ensure that it incorporates, as a minimum, those targets we have outlined in this report. |
Y |
||
|
Lambeth introduces a series of management checks at a minimum of 10%. |
N |
There are no formal management checks undertaken on the overpayments process. |
|
|
The Council Wide Debt Forum observes the progress of the management of HB recovery by monitoring: · monthly reports on progress against action plans · work in progress · the action plan and steps taken to address the issues identified by our inspection and recommendations. |
N N |
Although there are monthly reports on progress against targets and work in progress, there has been no plan to address the issues in the first report. |

