Appendix E:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fig. E.1: Analysis of post received from BA | |||
Type |
Number |
Met SLA quality target |
Met SLA time target |
| NHB1 | 42 |
No |
Yes |
| NHB1 (IS/JSA(IB))/(JSA) Entitlement | 12 |
No |
Yes |
| NHB (IS)/(JSA) Change of circumstances | 25 |
No |
Yes |
| NHB5 | 12 |
Yes |
No |
| NHB (IS)/(JSA) End of entitlement | 22 |
Yes |
Yes |
| NHB (Clerical) | 3 |
Yes |
Yes |
| NHB1-EP | 2 |
Yes |
Yes |
| Internal memo | 13 |
Yes |
No |
| HBF1 | 2 |
Yes |
Yes |
| HBF4 | 1 |
Yes |
Yes |
| Total | 134 |
||
Source: BFI analysis
As can be seen from the table above, BA is forwarding only the end of entitlement notices, the NHB(Clerical)s, the NHB1-EPs and HBF forms to Thanet in the prescribed manner. Of the other notifications and forms we found that:
From our sample we found that BA is not achieving the performance targets prescribed in the SLA and that this is having a detrimental effect on Thanets ability to process claims and payments on time.
There is an agreed commitment in the SLA to monitor the service levels, but we found no monitoring processes in place, either at Thanet or at BA.
We found that, because BA post is collected daily at noon by a courier from Thanet, this allows BA to gather and sort all the system printouts ready for collection. Therefore BA sends most NHB(IS) and NHB(JSA) notifications to Thanet on time and within the targets prescribed in the SLA. However, this does not allow for the entitlement notices to be attached to the NHB1 forms.
Furthermore, the information on the change of circumstances notifications does not always reflect the actual change. The BA benefit processors are not able to amend these as different staff collate the printouts.